A limited-service hotel (LSH) is a hotel without restaurant and banquet facilities, which are part of the defining characteristics of a full-service hotel (FSH).The LSH’s market position is based on the recognition that, for some travelers, the key requirement is a satisfactory room but few of the other amenities.

Lower investment outlay and operating cost, a feature shared by all LSHs, lead to a more stable investment product versus the FSH, and LSHs can deliver an on-par to slightly better risk-adjusted return than other commercial real estate classes.

[信報] 楊書健: 改裝酒店-增值型投資

(本文刊於信報: http://www2.hkej.com/wm/article/id/1312586)

楊書健: 改裝酒店-增值型投資
增值型投資計劃,是私募基金爭取回報的常用策略。簡單來說,基金以各種方法改善資產,令資產升值。有些個人投資者收購老舊單位,先裝修,再出售圖利,其實已經是增值型投資的雛型。機構投資者的計劃雖然規模較大較複雜,但是心態卻很類似。例如投資酒店,不少機構投資者就樂於收購老舊資產,將之改裝成酒店,提升租金收入之後,再出售圖利。因為酒店是品牌主導的生意,所以引入合適品牌,是改裝酒店的成功要訣。
近年不少翻新酒店都是有限服務酒店,私募基金的參與就是其中一個原因。廉價航空同樣大幅削減配套服務,以集中資源提供主要服務;因此廉航可算是有限服務酒店的姊妹行業。隨着亞洲中產數目增多,旅客數目將進一步增加,筆者相信,廉航和有限服務酒店將會繼續同步發展。

[Aspire] ADMIRAL INVESTMENT: WHY HOTEL REITS IN ASIA IS ATTRACTIVE NOW

Source: Aspire

ADMIRAL INVESTMENT: WHY HOTEL REITS IN ASIA IS ATTRACTIVE NOW
Over the last decade, hotel investment has become a valid alternative for investors in Singapore and beyond.
Hotel REITs including several listed in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan, became pure hotel owners that provide individual investors access to hotel ownership throughout Asia Pacific.

(A Chinese translation of the article is available at: http://cj.sharesinv.com/20160527/34781)

[SCMP] Victor Yeung: Limited service hotels continue to grow in Asia

Victor Yeung: Limited service hotels continue to grow in Asia
Over the last twenty years, limited service hotels have expanded its footprint to all major regions in the world. Rising demand from growing tourist markets is the primary reason, but changes to the hotel ownership and operational models have also accelerated capital investment into the sector.
We believe that hotels can be best compared to logistics assets two or three decades ago. Logistics assets saw a similar cycle, when investors were initially concerned with its long term investment value. However, once the ownership and operational models matured, logistics assets saw a one-time, secular value appreciation in multiple markets. This tightened the yield gap between logistics and office assets, and now in many markets, especially those with an active REIT market, logistics cap rates are on par with office or retail cap rates. We see hotels, more specifically limited service hotels, as having similar potential.


For the full article, please refer to the link below.
Victor Yeung: Limited service hotels continue to grow in Asia

EJ Insight: Why limited-service hotels can be a good investment


A limited-service hotel (LSH) is a hotel without restaurant and banquet facilities, which are part of the defining characteristics of a full-service hotel (FSH). The LSH’s market position is based on the recognition that, for some travelers, the key requirement is a satisfactory room but few of the other amenities.
Lower investment outlay and operating cost, a feature shared by all LSHs, leads to a more stable investment product versus the FSH, and LSHs can deliver an on-par to slightly better risk-adjusted return than other commercial real estate classes.
This is one of the reasons for the rapid growth of the sector over the last two decades.
(For the full article, please refer to the below link:
http://www.ejinsight.com/20160520-limited-service-hotels-can-be-good-investment/)

The Super Hotel chain in Japan offers limited amenities (though a few of the hotels have an in-house hot-spring spa), but service is the equal of that in full-service hotels. Photo: superhotel.co.jp

Admiral White Paper: A Case for Limited Service Hotel Investment

Admiral Investment has released a white paper entitled "A Case for Limited Service Hotel Investment" today. This is the first instalment of a series of articles and this white paper analyses limited service hotels as an investment alternative for investors. 

Limited service hotels focus on a satisfactory room experience but offer less amenities. This serves a wide clientele, from causal travellers to small-to-medium-enterprise employees. Industry data, including the growth of the low cost carrier market, suggest that this clientele has grown in the last two decades and is expected to grow by another 50% in the next five years. Investors should consider this asset class because it is seen as a lower risk alternative to full service hotels. While limited service hotels can serve as a constituent investment in a core or core-plus portfolio, limited service hotels also offer several strategies for value add investments. 

More information about this white paper series is available at http://investlsh.blogspot.com/ 

Attached please find the white paper for your reference:

http://www.admiralinv.com/Admiral%20-%20The%20Case%20for%20Limited%20Service%20Hotels.pdf


(Excerpt) The Ownership and Operational Model of Hotels

(The following is an exerpt of Admiral's Field Notes: REITs and Rental Real Estate)

Hotels
Hotels are similar to retail in that value is derived from end-user demand.  This means that a hotel operator is involved in many of the same marketing strategies as a mall operator.  The hotel operator needs to decide the clientele and the resulting service and amenities levels.

Because of the varied services expected for different levels of hotels (3-star versus 4-star versus 5-star), revenue per square foot, profit margin, and ultimately return on investment can be very different.  For example, a three star hotel has a lower revenue per room compared to a 5 star hotel, but its profit margin is typically 15 to 20 percentage points higher.  Thus, analysts should keep in mind that the cost structure is very different between different hotels.

In higher end hotels, often revenue from non-room sources (food & beverages, for example) will be as high as room revenue.  However, the profit margin differs widely.  In fact, some hotels target to only have their food and beverage business break even, and they drive overall profitability through maximizing profit from room revenue.  When calculating profit margins, analysts are cautioned to separate room from non-room revenue when they calculate the cost structure of hotels.

Hotels, furthermore, have several unique aspects.  First, hotel contracts are much shorter than leases of other property types.  Hotel leases are daily, and prices can be managed dynamically.  In fact, in most well run systems, computers are used to calculate latest offering prices, at 30-minute intervals, based on the latest occupancy rates and time away from the lease date.  This is the reason why a hotel website sometimes gives different rates within a fairly short period of time.

Ultimately, a hotel sees its room-nights as a perishable resource.  For every night that a hotel room does not have guest, the company receives zero revenue for that particular room night.  In the short term, a hotel can increase its attractiveness by lowering room rates.  Thus, on the one hand, a hotel would want to fill up its hotel as much as possible.  On the other hand, however, the hotel also does not want to decrease room rates too much.  Multiplying occupancy and average daily rates generates Revenue Per Available Room, or RevPAR for short, which captures the overall profitability of the hotel.  RevPAR multiplied by the number of hotel rooms is the room revenue.  Computer programs and human management specifically are managing room rates to generate as high of a RevPAR as possible.

Second, while a mall has its tenant relationships with the retailers, a hotel signs most of its contracts with customers directly.  This allows hotels to have a more targeted approach in bringing customers to their hotels.  Many hotels seek longer term contracts with airlines or travel companies to reduce the volatility of daily occupancy. These contracts, usually at a lower rate, keep occupancy up.  Since many of the hotel costs are fixed, keeping a reasonable level of occupancy from contracted guests covers operating expenses.  From there, the hotel can be more proactive in filling in the rest of the hotel with higher rate contracts with individual customers.

Owner versus Operator















Source: Admiral Investment

Third, hotels have increasingly segregated its ownership from operations. In this case, a hotel is typically owned by an investor without the network or brand strength to run the hotel.  The operation will be contracted out to an operator, who owns the brand and the systems for hotel management.  See the above illustration for the difference between the two models.

The operating risk can stay with the landlord, shared between the landlord and the operator, or transferred completely to the operator.  On one end of the spectrum, the operator collects a fixed fee for the operating services, and the landlord keeps all the upside and downside of the operation.  On the other end, the landlord master --leases the building to the operator, collects a fixed rent, and all operating upside stays with the operator.

Most contracts, however, will have a profit sharing element where the landlord and the operator share the risks and the profit.  If the landlord retains control, then the operator will provide the service, with profit sharing potentials if profit is above a certain level.  Increasingly, however, the landlord will lease out the building to the operator, but keep a percentage-rent clause, similar to a retail mall, so that the landlord shares some of the upside.

The latter structure is becoming popular because of an IFRS rule.  If a hotel is operated by the owner, it cannot be classified as an investment property.  The asset will have to be depreciated as a fixed asset.  If the hotel is leased out, however, the asset may be classified as an investment property and it may be revalued like other commercial buildings.  Thus, when analyzing a hotel landlord, it is important to focus on the economic substance, and not merely the legal relationship between the landlord and the tenant.

Hotel supply and demand are based on tourist arrivals.  Most countries report tourist arrivals transparently, and most have Tourism Boards to advocate tourism.  The tourism boards often have operational targets on tourist growth, which tend to be relatively realistic.  For example, the Hong Kong Tourism Board has a medium term target of 5% growth per year until 2017.
In addition, the tourism boards also report the number of nights per overnight tourist.  Nights per tourist often stay constant in the short term, and thus the current year number can be used to forecast future growth.  The number of tourists arriving multiplied by the average number of nights per overnight tourist gives realistic data for demand.

Supply response is similar to other asset classes, as it takes several years to build a high-rise hotel.  Furthermore, hotels typically have a lower per-square foot value than offices or malls, especially in city center where hotels are in higher demand.  If hotels do not form their own planning zone, often they will be crowded out.  Developers may acquire a fully functioning hotel and redevelop the site into an office tower.  The Ritz Carlton Hotel in Hong Kong was redeveloped into the China Construction Bank Building in the last cycle, for example.  This is the reason why some Asia Pacific economies have implemented a hotel-only planning zone to maintain a certain level of hotel rooms in the city center.

財經觀點/寶島觀光業前景樂觀

http://udn.com/news/story/7241/1189356/

財經觀點/寶島觀光業前景樂觀

2015-09-16 03:08 聯合報 楊書健(安泓投資投資總監)

根據交通部觀光局數字,2014年入境旅客約一千萬人次,相比十年前的約三百萬人次,上升超過兩倍。香港土地面積只有台灣的百分之三,2014年卻接待六千萬遊客,其中一千四百萬人次為大陸以外旅客。未來幾年,美元轉強,會令港幣相對其他亞洲貨幣強勢。原來準備去香港的遊客,或會轉投他地,而台灣或會得益。
根據hotels.com的研究報告,截至2014年,台北的平均旅館房價為3,659元,相對香港、澳門及新加坡都有所折讓。加上台灣的整體物價比較便宜,遊台的花費應比其他選擇更物超所值。我認為,台灣未來幾年的旅遊發展,情況樂觀。
由台北的夜巿,到台南的歷史古蹟,都是值得開發的旅遊資源。其他城巿有港口、有溫泉,都能發展成休閒飯店。根據觀察,隨著其他亞洲城巿的飯店業務見頂,外資最近對台灣飯店似乎重拾興趣。筆者公司最近研究了數個投資專案,預期回報率都比其他亞洲城巿要高。
有興趣投資的外資有好幾類,包括以亞太區飯店為主題的私募基金及房託,及部分長線投資者。飯店的租金升跌較多,現金流的風險誠然比辦公室或商場高,因而飯店的租金回報率,一般都比辦公室高好幾個百分點。經營飯店,漸漸趨向業權及營運分家,所以各本業為房地產投資的基金,都開始將飯店納入投資組合。
現代的飯店管理,物業業權跟品牌管理每每分開。擅長投資的地產商或房地產基金,負責開發及擁有飯店的業權,而品牌商則負責管理。例如,曾經兼顧物業及品牌的萬豪飯店在1993年分析成獨立的房託及品牌商,前者稱為萬豪服務(Host Marriott Corp.),擁有世界各地的飯店業權;後者為萬豪國際飯店集團(Marriott),是品牌商,旗下有JW萬豪、麗思卡爾頓(Ritz-Carlton)、萬麗(Renaissance)等飯店品牌。
台灣不少飯店品牌以經營自己擁有的飯店為主。台灣服務業的水準卓越,員工優秀,而飯店建立品牌,服務水平是其中一個決定因素,所以很多台灣本地的飯店品牌,實在值得推廣到外地去。
其他亞洲品牌,例如以香港為基地的香格里拉、文華東方及半島飯店,近十年都進行了海外擴張。部分新飯店是自主開發、自主營運,但亦有不少是跟建商合作,與建商合作,所需資金較低,能讓品牌迅速建立經營網絡,讓用家在各主要城巿,都能找到品牌旗下的飯店;一旦區域網絡成形,品牌就更有議價能力,進一步擴展版圖,形成良性循環。